EN
PL
In the world of business, science, and even private life, data has become one of the most valuable resources today. For companies, in the era of digital transformation, data has become a key asset driving decision-making processes, business analytics, and the development of innovative solutions. However, with the growing volume of data come challenges related to its storage, management, and integration.
This is particularly important in the context of building data models and data warehouses, where the quality and consistency of information are of fundamental importance. In this context, Excel—a tool widely used for storing and analyzing data—evokes both praise and controversy. Is it an indispensable helper or a source of problems in data management? Does it make our lives easier, or on the contrary—does it become a source of chaos?
Excel: A versatile tool, but not without flaws
Microsoft Excel has long remained one of the most popular tools for working with data. Its advantages are well known: an intuitive interface, broad analytical capabilities, flexibility in report creation, and accessibility. For many teams, Excel is the first choice for data storage, especially in smaller projects or early development phases. However, as the scale and complexity of data grow, its limitations become increasingly apparent.
The main challenge associated with Excel is its susceptibility to creating fragmented, inconsistent datasets. In organizations, it is common to encounter situations where different departments store data in separate spreadsheets, using different formats, structures, or even methodologies. This leads to issues with data integration, quality, and consistency, directly impacting the effectiveness of analytical and decision-making processes.
The problem of fragmented data
Imagine that in your company, each department uses Excel to store data. Marketing has its spreadsheets, finance has its own, and sales has others. As a result, the data becomes fragmented, and its consistency and timeliness become problematic. It’s common for the same information to be stored in multiple places, leading to misunderstandings, errors, and wasted time. This is when Excel turns into a “necessary evil.”
To avoid chaos, it is worth implementing proper data management practices. Here are some key principles:
- Data centralization – If possible, move data to a single, centralized system such as an SQL database or cloud-based data management tools (e.g., Google BigQuery, Microsoft Azure). This ensures that all users access the same, up-to-date information.
- Standardization of formats – If Excel is essential, establish common standards for file naming, table structures, and data formatting. This helps prevent misunderstandings.
- Process automation – Instead of manual data entry, use automation tools such as Power Query. This reduces the risk of errors and saves time.
- Access control – If data is stored in multiple locations, it’s important to control who can access it. This helps avoid accidental deletion or modification of key information.
- Regular audits – Periodically review data to ensure it is up-to-date and consistent. This helps catch potential errors early.
Many organizations store data in distributed environments—from local Excel files to cloud databases, CRM systems, or project management tools. This decentralization can lead to serious issues, especially when Excel data is meant to serve as a foundation for building data models or data warehouses. The main challenges include:
- Lack of data consistency – Different teams may use different formats, naming conventions, or units of measurement, making data integration difficult.
- Duplication of information – The same data may be stored in multiple places, increasing the risk of errors and outdated information.
- Limited scalability – Excel is not designed to handle large datasets, which can lead to performance issues.
- Lack of version control – In team environments, it’s hard to track changes and ensure everyone is using the most current data.
Excel in the context of data warehouses: friend or foe?
Can Excel also be used effectively as a data management tool in the context of data warehouses? The answer is: yes, but only if it’s used thoughtfully and in accordance with best practices. Excel can serve as a tool for preliminary data collection and analysis, but as projects grow in scale and complexity, it becomes necessary to move the data to more advanced systems.
It is crucial that organizations understand Excel’s limitations and invest in solutions that ensure data consistency, scalability, and security. Data warehouses require solid foundations, and Excel data can be part of those foundations only if it is properly managed and processed.
In the era of big data and advanced analytics, Excel is neither an enemy nor a savior—it is a tool whose effectiveness depends on how it is used. That’s why it’s worth investing in education, standardization, and modern technologies to maximize the value of data, no matter where or in what form it is stored.
Author: Artur Sadzik, Senior Business Consultant at StatSoft